The Art of Being Right: 15 Key Lessons, Summary and Review

the art of being right
TitleThe Art of Being Right
AuthorArthur Schopenhauer
PublisherCreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform
Purchase LinkBuy Here

The book “The Art of Being Reasonable” is a classic of philosophical literature, written by Arthur Schopenhauer, one of the most important thinkers of the 19th century.

Originally published in 1830, the book is a practical guide for those who wish to become more persuasive in their arguments, regardless of the veracity of the information they are presenting. Read other classic book summaries here!

Synopsis of The Art of Being Right

This book is a practical guide for anyone who wants to improve their rhetoric and know tricks people use.

The book is divided into 38 stratagems, that is, techniques to win a debate without having to be right. Schopenhauer describes each of these techniques in detail, giving examples of how they can be used in practice.

The author also includes observations about human nature and how people tend to react to certain arguments. You can buy The Art of Being Right clicking here.

Summary of The Art of Being Right

Schopenhauer begins the book by stating that the objective of a debate is not the search for the truth, but the victory over the opponent.

The book has 4 four parts. In the first, the author gives the theory of his strategies. In the second part, he describes the main tricks used to win a debate, even including changing the subject and reversing roles. In the third part, the author explains how to identify the techniques used to defend oneself. In the fourth part, he talks about style and rhetoric.

According to the author, truth is often subjective and depends on one’s perspective.

Therefore, he proposes that, instead of trying to prove himself right, the debater should focus on defeating the opponent, regardless of what the other’s true position is. Read a summary on The Art of War here!

Review of The Art of Being Right

“The Art of Being Right” is a provocative book that challenges the way people tend to think about debates.

The book is well written and easy to read, with many examples illustrating the concepts presented. Schopenhauer also includes insightful observations about human nature and how people tend to react to certain arguments. Without a doubt, worth reading!

Although the book is quite old, the techniques described by Schopenhauer are still relevant today.

Many people still use these techniques in political debates, online discussions, and even in everyday conversations.

Schopenhauer argues that truth is not the main concern of debaters, but victory. He believes that it is possible to win a debate even if you are not right, as long as you use the right techniques. You can buy The Art of Being Right clicking here.

15 Key Lessons from The Art of Being Right

Here are 15 of the main lessons that can be extracted from the book “The Art of Being Right”:

  1. The purpose of a debate is not the search for the truth, but the victory over the opponent.
  2. The truth is often subjective and depends on one’s perspective.
  3. 3. Use extreme examples to draw attention and illustrate your points.
  1. Divert attention from the main point of the debate to a tangential issue that you can control.
  2. Reverse the roles and have the opponent defend a position he doesn’t believe in.
  3. Ask leading questions that put the opponent on the defensive.
  4. Create an emotional climate for the debate in order to distract the opponent and take him out of his comfort zone.
  5. Use the exaggeration technique to emphasize your points.
  6. Utilize the ad hominem fallacy, attacking the opponent’s credibility or personality rather than their arguments.
  7. Create a sense of urgency or imminent danger to force your opponent to make a hasty decision.
  8. Use the contradiction technique by stating something that appears to be contrary to what you really mean.
  9. Use the generalization technique to make a specific example appear to represent a broader pattern.
  10. Make use of clichés and catchphrases to persuade your opponent.
  11. Use silence or lack of response to create a climate of uncertainty and discomfort in your opponent.
  12. Use the authority technique, citing experts or important people to support your arguments.

Negative Points of The Art of Being Right

Despite being a very interesting and provocative book, “The Art of Being Right” has some limitations.

The book assumes that the purpose of debate is victory over one’s opponent, not the pursuit of truth. This view may seem cynical or disrespectful to those who believe that debate is an opportunity to share knowledge and learn from others.

Finally, the book does not provide clear guidance on how to use the techniques ethically.

But that doesn’t stop reading and enjoying the book. For those interested in debating, it is important to know the main arguments. Read a summary on Heretics, by Chesterton, here.

Positive Points of The Art of Reason

Despite its limitations, “The Art of Being Right” is a valuable book for several reasons.

First, the book is a classic work of philosophy and an important source of insight into human nature and rhetoric. In addition, the book offers a realistic and pragmatic view on debate, highlighting the strategies that people actually use to persuade others in conflict situations.

Ultimately, the book is a fascinating and challenging read for anyone interested in improving their argumentation and persuasion skills. To read a summary about the book On Stories, by C. S. Lewis, here.

Is The Art of Being Reason worth reading?

“The Art of Being Right” is a provocative and challenging book that offers a realistic and pragmatic view on debate and persuasion.

With the book, readers can gain a deeper understanding of how people think in conflict situations, as well as learn strategies to become more effective in their own argumentation skills. The book is worth reading!

However, it is important to remember that the purpose of the debate should not be victory over the opponent, but the search for truth and the exchange of ideas.

When using the techniques described in this book, it is essential to do so ethically and responsibly, respecting others and avoiding manipulation and dishonesty.

If you’re interested in reading the book, it’s so worth checking out! You can buy The Art of Being Right clicking here.

Questions about The Art of Being Right

See some common questions about this famous book by the German thinker.

What is the reason for Schopenhauer?

For Schopenhauer, reason is a tool that serves the will, helping us navigate the world and satisfy our desires.

How does the will manifest itself in the human being Schopenhauer?

According to Schopenhauer, the will manifests itself in the human being through desires, impulses and needs, being the driving force behind all our actions.

How to win any Schopenhauer debate?

Schopenhauer, in “The Art of Being Right,” suggests such stratagems as distorting an opponent’s arguments, attacking the opponent, not the argument, and using fallacies to confuse the opponent.

What was the most important artistic language for Schopenhauer?

Schopenhauer believed that music was the most important artistic language, as he considered it the most direct expression of will.

What is reason for Nietzsche?

For Nietzsche, reason is a tool that helps us to interpret and make sense of the world, but which can be limited and often influenced by our impulses and desires.

What does Kant say about reason?

Kant sees reason as a faculty that allows us to understand and interpret the world. According to him, there is a distinction between theoretical reason (used to understand the natural world) and practical reason (used in morality).

What is Nietzsche’s most famous quote?

One of Nietzsche’s most famous quotes is “What doesn’t kill me makes me stronger”.

How to be happy according to Schopenhauer?

Answer: Schopenhauer suggests that happiness can be achieved by renouncing the will, since the will leads to suffering.

What does Nietzsche’s theory say?

Nietzsche championed the idea of ​​the “Superman”, an individual who transcends ordinary morality. He criticized Christian morality and Western philosophy, and emphasized the power of the will.

Why does Nietzsche break with Schopenhauer’s thought?

Nietzsche broke with Schopenhauer because he rejected Schopenhauer’s pessimism. Nietzsche advocated the affirmation of life rather than the renunciation of the will.

What was Schopenhauer’s main thought?

Schopenhauer’s main thought is that the will is the fundamental force in the universe and that it is the cause of our suffering.

What is Schopenhauer’s criticism?

Schopenhauer criticized Hegel’s idealism and rationalist philosophy, arguing that reality is guided by will, not reason.

Why was Schopenhauer against Hegel?

Schopenhauer was against Hegel because he rejected Hegel’s absolute idealism, arguing that his philosophy was obscure, artificial and did not reflect the true nature of reality.

What are Schopenhauer’s two main concepts?

Schopenhauer’s two main concepts are will and representation. Will is the fundamental force of the universe, and representation is how we perceive and interpret that will.

What is love for Schopenhauer?

For Schopenhauer, love is a manifestation of the will seeking to perpetuate the species. He saw it as an illusion that leads to suffering rather than true happiness.

What is reason for Hobbes?

For Hobbes, reason is the human ability to use logic and reasoning to understand and influence the world around us.

What are the 3 ideas of Friedrich Nietzsche?

Nietzsche’s three main ideas are the “will to power” (the main driving force in life), the “death of God” (the rejection of Christian morality), and the idea of ​​the “Superman” (an individual beyond morality). traditional).

What is the reason for Descartes?

For Descartes, reason is the main tool for acquiring knowledge, allowing us to doubt, think and understand reality.

What is Kant’s theory?

Kant’s theory, known as transcendental idealism, argues that our knowledge is limited by our ability to perceive and understand the world. He also proposed the “morality of duty”, centered on the idea of ​​the categorical imperative.

What is Kant’s main criticism?

The main criticism of Kant is that his philosophy is complex and abstract, and that his idea that reality is partly constructed by the human mind can be considered subjective.

What was Kant’s conclusion?

Kant concluded that while our knowledge is limited by our perception and understanding, we are still able to act morally and understand certain fundamental aspects of the world.

What is the most impactful phrase?

This is subjective, depending on the personal context of each one. A common striking phrase is “Be the change you want to see in the world”, attributed to Gandhi.

What is the most famous quote by Mário Sérgio Cortella?

One of Cortella’s most famous quotes is: “We are not born ready. Life is a constant exercise in becoming what we are”.

Who was Nietzsche’s greatest inspiration?

Nietzsche was heavily influenced by Schopenhauer, whose work he discovered during his years of study.

What is happiness for Nietzsche?

For Nietzsche, happiness comes from affirming life, overcoming challenges and expressing the will to power.

Why for Schopenhauer, the will is a source of suffering?

Schopenhauer believed that the will was a source of suffering because our desires are incessant and often unsatisfied, and their satisfaction only leads to the emergence of new desires.

How does Schopenhauer see reality?

Schopenhauer saw reality as being divided between will (the fundamental force of the universe) and representation (the perception and interpretation of that will by human beings).

What does Freud say about Nietzsche?

Freud had a high regard for Nietzsche and considered him “profound”. However, he denied being directly influenced by Nietzsche, despite there being several similarities in their thoughts.

What is Nietzsche’s line of thought?

Nietzsche’s line of thought is often associated with perspectivism (there is no single objective truth), existentialism, and criticism of traditional morality and religion.

What kind of philosophy did Nietzsche have?

Nietzsche is often associated with existentialism and postmodernism. He is known for his critique of traditional morality, Western religion and philosophy, and his affirmation of life.

What was Schopenhauer’s Religion?

Schopenhauer was an atheist. He criticized religion, considering it an illusion created to alleviate human suffering.

What is Nietzsche’s Superman?

Nietzsche’s “Superman” is an ideal of a human being who has overcome traditional morality and lives according to his own will to power.

Why was Arthur Schopenhauer pessimistic?

Schopenhauer was pessimistic because he saw life as dominated by the will, which he considered a constant source of pain and suffering due to the insatiable desires of human beings.

What is freedom for Schopenhauer?

For Schopenhauer, true freedom can only be found in renouncing the will, as he believed that the will was the source of suffering.

How does Schopenhauer see the world?

Schopenhauer sees the world as a manifestation of the will, which is blind, irrational and a source of suffering. For him, the best way to deal with it is through aesthetics and renunciation of the will.

How to start studying Schopenhauer?

To begin studying Schopenhauer, you can start by reading his major works, such as “The World as Will and Representation,” and looking for scholarly commentary and analysis.

Why does Schopenhauer not believe in free will?

Schopenhauer believed that all actions are determined by the will, which is irrational and blind. Therefore, he denied the existence of authentic free will.

What is love for Nietzsche?

Nietzsche saw love as a form of possession or dominion, a manifestation of the will to power.

What does Nietzsche say about friendship?

Nietzsche valued friendship as a relationship between equals and considered it a higher form of human relationship, where the will to power could be expressed in a more subtle and refined way.

What is love for Socrates?

For Socrates, love is a desire to possess the good and the beautiful forever. He also saw love as a means of ascent to truth and knowledge, a concept he explored in the Platonic dialogue “The Symposium”.

 What are the Arts of being Right?

the german philosopherSchopenhauer is best known for his book “The Art of Being Right” which features 38 dialectical stratagems such as personal attacks and misrepresenting the opposing argument.

How to win a debate even if you don’t have a critical reason?

Schopenhauer suggests such stratagems as the use of quibbles, personal attacks, and misrepresentation of the opponent’s argument.

How many pages in the book The Art of Being Right?

The number of pages can vary depending on the edition and format of the book, but generally Schopenhauer’s “The Art of Being Right” has about 88 pages.

How to win an argument even if you’re wrong?

According to Schopenhauer, it is possible to win a debate even if you are wrong by distorting the opponent’s argument, diverting the focus from the issue, among other tactics.

How to close a debate?

Closing a debate usually involves a summary of the main points discussed and a conclusion based on those points.

What replaces debate?

Alternatives to debate can include collaborative dialogues, panel discussions, round tables or mediation.

How to win a debate being right?

Present clear arguments, supported by facts and evidence, respond to objections calmly and coherently, and stay focused on the topic.

How to win debates and influence people?

To win debates and influence people, it is important to present clear, persuasive and well-reasoned arguments, as well as demonstrate active listening skills and respect for other participants.

How to win any book debate?

There are several books on the subject, including “Thank You for Arguing” by Jay Heinrichs and “The Art of Being Right” by Schopenhauer.

What is the best war strategy?

The best war strategy depends on the specific context. It usually involves maximizing your own strengths, exploiting the enemy’s weaknesses, and adapting to change.

How does war strategy work?

A war strategy is a long-term plan designed to achieve a specific objective in a war, taking into account variables such as resources, terrain, and opponent.

How to have a good debate?

A good debate requires preparation, knowledge of the topic, clarity of thought, active listening skills, respect for the opinions of others and the ability to present persuasive arguments.

How to refute an argument?

To refute an argument, you must identify its flaws, present counterarguments based on facts and logic, and remain calm and respectful during the discussion.

What is needed for a good argument?

Good argumentation requires clarity of thought, knowledge of the topic, facts or evidence to support your points, active listening skills, and respect for the opinions of others.

What is a strong argument?

A strong argument is one that is clear, logical, well-grounded in facts or evidence, and capable of withstanding criticism and counter-arguments.

How long does a debate last?

The duration of a debate can vary, but generally they last between 60 and 90 minutes.

What is the main purpose of a debate?

The main purpose of a debate is to explore different points of view on an issue through argumentation and counter-argumentation.

What is a debate to convince?

A convincing debate is one in which the participants try to persuade the audience or opponent to accept their point of view.

What do you have in a ruled debate?

A structured debate has clear rules about speaking time, order of speeches, and participant conduct to ensure a fair and respectful discussion.

What does lack of understanding mean?

Lack of understanding refers to a situation where a person does not understand or is not aware of something.

How to influence people?

Influence can be gained through building trust, demonstrating expertise, communicating effectively, active listening, and demonstrating empathy.

How to win a debate even if you are not right author?

The author of the book “The Art of Being Right”, which discusses how to win a debate even when you are not right, is the German philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer.

What topics can generate a debate?

Topics that can generate debate include politics, religion, ethics, social issues, science, technology and education, among many others.

How to win a debate even if you don’t have a critical reason?

To win a debate without being right, Schopenhauer suggests using strategies and tactics that shift the focus away from the truth and focus on persuasion.

How many pages has the book How to win a debate even if you’re not right?

How to Win a Debate Even if You’re Not Right has 88 pages.

How to win a debate being right?

To win a debate by being right, it is important to present clear, fact-based arguments and have effective communication skills to persuade others.

How to refute a person?

To disprove a person, you need to dismantle their arguments using facts, logic, and reasoning. Courtesy and respect are also essential.

What replaces debate?

Alternatives to debate can include dialogues, group discussions, individual conversations, panel discussions or forums.

How to end a debate?

A debate can be closed by summarizing the key points, restating your position, and thanking your opponent and audience for their time and attention.

How to win debates and influence people?

Winning debates and influencing people involves communication skills, persuasive argumentation, empathy and an understanding of human psychology.

What is a debate to convince?

A convincing debate is a structured discussion aimed at persuading an opponent or the public to accept a particular point of view.

What does Eristic mean?

Eristic refers to the art of debating, with the main aim of winning the argument, not necessarily seeking the truth.

Who created the fallacy?

Fallacies are errors of reasoning that have existed since antiquity. The Greek philosopher Aristotle was the first to systematize and study fallacies.

The Art of Being Right book discussion?

“The Art of Being Right” by Schopenhauer is a guide that teaches strategies to win arguments, regardless of the veracity of the arguments.

How to speak well in debate?

Speaking well in debate takes practice, knowledge of the topic, effective communication skills, and a respectful attitude towards your opponents.

What to do to avoid an argument?

To avoid an argument, you can pursue peaceful dialogue, listen actively, express opinions respectfully, and avoid controversial topics if the situation is sensitive.

how to discuss with class?

Classy arguing involves respecting the opinions of others, listening actively, expressing ideas clearly and respectfully, and avoiding personal attacks.

What is said in a debate?

In a debate, participants discuss different perspectives on a specific topic, presenting arguments and counter-arguments to support their positions.

What does lack of understanding mean?

Lack of understanding means not understanding or not being accordingly with an idea, concept or perspective.

What name is given to the person who conducts a debate with two or more participants?

The person who conducts a debate with two or more participants is called a moderator.

How to act in a school debate?

In a school debate, it is important to research and understand the topic, respect the opinions of others, speak clearly and concisely, and listen actively.

What is a strong argument?

A strong argument is one that is well-founded, logical, coherent and supported by relevant evidence or facts.

How can we argue?

We can argue by presenting ideas logically and coherently, using evidence to support our claims, and effectively listening to and responding to counter arguments.

What are the 38 strategies for winning any debate?

The 38 strategies are detailed in Schopenhauer’s book, “How to Win a Debate Without Having to Be Right.” They range from the use of fallacies to deflection techniques.

What topics can generate a debate?

Several topics can generate debate, including politics, environment, human rights, technology, education, health and social issues.

How to influence people?

Influencing people requires communication skills, empathy, reliability, authenticity and the ability to persuade ethically.

How to persuade and convince?

Persuading and convincing requires the use of strong arguments, emotional appeal, understanding the target audience, effective communication skills and credibility.

Why is the debate important?

Debate is important because it promotes critical thinking, the exchange of ideas, understanding different perspectives and improving communication skills.

What are the rules of a ruled debate?

The rules of an orderly debate might include mutual respect, limited time to speak, obligation to stick to the topic under discussion, and prohibition of personal attacks.

What is the difference between fallacy and sophistry?

Fallacy is an error in reasoning, while sophistry is a misleading or false argument made with the intent to deceive.

What does the word dialectically mean?

Dialectically refers to the use of dialectics, a method of argumentation that explores the relationship between opposites and seeks the resolution of contradictions.

What is an argumentum ad auditores?

“Argumentum ad auditores” is a rhetorical strategy that appeals directly to listeners’ emotions or prejudices to gain support for an argument.

How to reason logically?

Reasoning logically involves following principles of logic such as consistency and validity, evaluating evidence, avoiding fallacies, and making inferences based on valid premises.

What are the most common types of fallacies?

Common fallacies include appeal to authority, ad hominem, false cause, slippery slope, appeal to ignorance, false dilemma, and circular argument.

What is a fallacy examples?

A fallacy is an error in reasoning. For example, “ad hominem” is a fallacy that attacks the person rather than his argument.

Why does Nietzsche break with Schopenhauer’s thought?

Nietzsche breaks with Schopenhauer for disagreeing with the pessimism and denial of the will to life defended by Schopenhauer, opting for a more affirmative thought of life.

What are the causes of suffering according to Schopenhauer?

For Schopenhauer, suffering is caused by the incessant and insatiable will of human beings, which leads to frustration, desire and pain.

What is Schopenhauer’s thought?

Schopenhauer defended philosophical pessimism, arguing that life is fundamentally suffering due to the incessant will of the human being. He also discussed debate strategies in his work.

Vítor Costa

PhD in Polymer Science and Technology. Loves to read and study about sciences, psychology, philosophy and other subjects.

Readers also Like